UKBouldering.com

significant repeats (Read 4303943 times)

Muenchener

Offline
  • *****
  • Trusted Users
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +117/-0
#5200 Re: significant repeats
December 29, 2014, 09:03:25 pm
As for climbing on wet rock, the author has suddenly got a conscience cos it's happening closer to home after spending weeks climbing on wet rock in swizzy last year.

Granite is not sandstone. And vice versa.

a dense loner

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 7165
  • Karma: +388/-28
#5201 Re: significant repeats
December 29, 2014, 09:13:15 pm
Which is why I said what I said and followed it with "but where is the line?".
Ie do you advise people not to climb on any rock after rain? 2/3 days after rain? Granite just climb on it if it can be dried? All other rock types just climb on it after rain if you're local or a visitor with a pedigree above 8A on trips?

Muenchener

Offline
  • *****
  • Trusted Users
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +117/-0
#5202 Re: significant repeats
December 29, 2014, 09:27:17 pm
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't sandstone the only major rock type that's severely weakened by being wet? And surely it can't be too much to ask the average boulderer to learn to tell the difference between "sandstone" and "not sandstone"?

monkey boy

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1195
  • Karma: +65/-0
#5203 Re: significant repeats
December 29, 2014, 09:34:14 pm
Which is why at the end of the day everyone has to be free to make their own, hopefully educated, decision. I didn't like being told what I could/couldn't do in Red Rocks. I felt like I could make an educated decision with information from local climbers because of my experience. Hopefully the more information that is out there the more educated we can be.

kingholmesy

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 564
  • Karma: +47/-0
#5204 Re: significant repeats
December 29, 2014, 10:27:22 pm
Having just read Hedgers' blog I'm struggling to decide if it's a piss take or not, I quote....

“Give me the cams, I am going to do it now.” I said softly.

E8 is the big boys league and only few achieved this level – they are the ones with the biggest balls of them all

It’s a dangerous man’s sport and I don’t know why we do this"

 :wank:

granticus

Offline
  • ****
  • forum abuser
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +25/-2
#5205 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 09:24:06 am
Alex Waterhouse climbed Careless Torque today, Good effort!
This is in danger of getting lost amongst the non-significant repeat discussion above.
Flippin' brilliant effort Alex and a choice tick for your first 8a, well done!  ;D

rodma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1624
  • Karma: +60/-3
#5206 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 09:55:31 am
Even mcleod posted a video this year of him doing a problem in torridon where he had an in situ towel on the finish hold. The entire problem looked sopping.

No one comments on the poor ethics cos he is a hero. If I comment I just look bitter, but that's mostly because I am.

rodma

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1624
  • Karma: +60/-3

Doylo

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6694
  • Karma: +442/-7
#5208 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 11:03:51 am
Former junior comp queen Jemma Powell is a decent boulderer these days. She climbed Corridors of Power (8A) a few months ago and Stoned Temple Pilots (8A) recently. Still not many British females cranking the Font 8's and she's got a full time job and a kid too boot.

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 7999
  • Karma: +633/-115
    • Unknown Stones
#5209 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 11:20:26 am
Yeah but were the problems dry?

Luke Owens

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1311
  • Karma: +66/-0
    • My Blog
#5210 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 11:54:02 am
Former junior comp queen Jemma Powell is a decent boulderer these days. She climbed Corridors of Power (8A) a few months ago and Stoned Temple Pilots (8A) recently. Still not many British females cranking the Font 8's and she's got a full time job and a kid too boot.

Strong effort, I have a lot of respect for the people climbing well with a full time job and kids.

Doylo

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 6694
  • Karma: +442/-7
#5211 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 12:37:22 pm
There's only really Shauna and Mina climbing in the 8's and they're both full time.

Paul B

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 9627
  • Karma: +264/-4
#5212 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 03:41:10 pm
Its always good/interesting to see the names from the past (i.e. the people that were performing in the comps back when I was errr not) going well these days. It's the same names that keep cropping up.

Quite a good advert for the whole comp thing in my eyes.

FilW

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
#5213 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 04:16:58 pm
Alex Waterhouse climbed Careless Torque today, Good effort!
This is in danger of getting lost amongst the non-significant repeat discussion above.
Flippin' brilliant effort Alex and a choice tick for your first 8a, well done!  ;D

News of Alex's send of Careless Torque on the other channel...................

http://www.ukclimbing.com/news/item.php?id=69403

dave

  • Guest
#5214 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 07:16:41 pm
What is all that mess on the left?


monkey boy

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Posts: 1195
  • Karma: +65/-0
#5215 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 07:25:21 pm
Class! Great effort Alex!

Mina did Lethal Design the other day too. Bird climbing 8A+ still worth a mention  ;)

Hot Muffin

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: +0/-0
#5216 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 07:33:53 pm
What is all that mess on the left?



if you look at the actual video you will see that its just ice you bean

dave

  • Guest
#5217 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 07:40:47 pm
No, the ice in the video is to the left of that. Since when does ice form in thin horizontal chalk-white lines, mysteriously appearing between the "arriving at the crag" footage and the "trying the problem" footage?

Hot Muffin

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: +0/-0
#5218 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 07:43:25 pm
valid point, no continuous footage so can a send really be given, he couldve used a ladder?

FilW

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
#5219 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 11:35:09 pm
No, the ice in the video is to the left of that. Since when does ice form in thin horizontal chalk-white lines, mysteriously appearing between the "arriving at the crag" footage and the "trying the problem" footage?
It's some chalk on a damp patch where the ice was. All cleaned off before they left so don't get overexcited. ;)

dave

  • Guest
#5220 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 11:42:24 pm
I dare say it was cleaned off. But will still appear as a bad example to anyone watching the video.

FilW

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
#5221 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 11:52:20 pm
Is that really all you took away from the video?

dave

  • Guest
#5222 Re: significant repeats
December 30, 2014, 11:57:01 pm
No but it did stick out like a sore thumb. Massive random chalked area not exactly commonplace, thankfully.

FilW

Offline
  • *
  • newbie
  • Posts: 7
  • Karma: +0/-0
#5223 Re: significant repeats
December 31, 2014, 12:02:04 am
Well, if he hadn't got the send or it hadn't been videoed you'd never had known about something that was gone again after a few hours, so pretend you didn't watch it and you can sleep easier. ;)

Will Hunt

Offline
  • *****
  • forum hero
  • Superworm is super-long
  • Posts: 7999
  • Karma: +633/-115
    • Unknown Stones
#5224 Re: significant repeats
December 31, 2014, 10:45:10 am
It's doubtless a good tick, but your argument is the sum of fuck all. Anybody climbing needs to know that trying to dry rock by plastering it with chalk is bellendular behaviour. It doesn't work, it makes the rock stay damp, and it looks shit. Whether or not it was filmed or not makes no difference.
I'm stunned that somebody can get to 8A and not know this.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal